Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigbadblair
I can’t believe I’m going to say this but I agree with part of Don’s last comment. If those articles are true, this is not a win for anyone, and especially native trout. (I’m curious why the minister isn’t quoted but everyone else is in those articles?)
But on the positive voices were heard, those that sent letters of opposition were not complicit in the decision, and now everyone is implicated in current management regime continuing..
Choosing fun over conservation is a little short sighted in my mind and believing recovery is done by fixing just habitat is a little simplistic/unrealistic, but time will tell.
At some point in time the community has to be for something, not just against everything…
I’m out- *moves back into the shadows*
|
Big....
I tried to get the effects on habitat recognized in the Policy Fish Conservaton Stratergy for Alberta. Nope, the Policy was all about fishermen. AEP blinders solidly in place.
The Native Trout plan hopefully will realize real changes in how Alberta deals with the land abuse.
I see that Angler's revolt as a line in the sand. They have had enough of paying for others activities.
Don