Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushrat
Of course they wouldn't issue a Wilderness carry permit without allowing you to shoot it, that's what I was referring to in reply to 700-223 who basically asked if it was legal to discharge a firearm on a trapline if you had a wilderness carry permit. Wilderness carry allows the holder to be exempt from the regulations that require restricted firearms to only be legally fired at an approved range. Again you take it out of context and twist it around to try to suit the agenda your trying to push.
|
I'm not twisting any agenda or taking anything out of context. You're saying an ATC makes one exempt from "the regulations that require restricted firearms to only be legally fired at an approved range". What regulation is that? Section 19?
The one that basically says says a person who has their RPAL may be authorized to transport their firearm for any good and sufficient reason such as:
i) for target practice at an approved range. (Paraphrased).
Section 19 is about being authorized to transport and what criteria need to be met to obtain authorization/approval to transport. So of course target practice at an approved range would be a valid reason for authorization to transport. And you would not be authorized to transport it to your friend's house to plink. But the rural homeowner who has his restricteds licensed to that address who shoots from his house/dwelling in an area where there are no discharge bylaws doesn't require any authorization to transport to do that.
Do you guys honestly not understand that?