Quote:
Originally Posted by 243plus
So do we throw DU, CWF and SCI under the bus? Seriously, do we? WCS is a broad, broad tent, and that usually means we won't everything a group does.
BTW, I couldn't find anything about suzuki in either the Canadian or the international reports.
Now, back to my original question, what in the report is wrong? Honest question. What is wrong in it?
|
Not sure what any of those organizations have to do with the report you reference.
One of the first things that is wrong with the report is this:
Quote:
Funding:
This important conservation assessment was supported by the
Edmonton Community Foundation, Royal Bank of Canada, Wilburforce
Foundations, and the Yellowstone-to-Yukon Initiative.
|
That's who has paid for a report that recommends a giant Wildland Park, a dedicated Wolverine refugia (???) and the closure of the majority of the area from OHV use. A far cry from an integrated, multi-user approach - but a multi-user approach is far, far from the vision of Y2Y and Wilburforce.