Quote:
Originally Posted by whammy
No. It is the reason the bill was introduced and the reason the bill was passed. Sorry if you are too stuck on your high horse to admit it.
|
It didn't pass, and I am not on any "High Horse". If you are to ignorant to comprehend that there could be many different reasons that different people would use such a Bill to protect their rights, then you are the one who has the problem.
We have already seen published cases of a baker being forced to provide services to a gay couple, a barber taken to task for not cutting a woman's hair (had nothing to do with her sexuality), and a couple cases where a religious school was sued for firing or not hiring a gay person. And then there has been speculation about butchers and JP's possibly being forced to provide services that would violate their moral convictions.
So there are more than one reason why such a bill was put forth than your rather limited opinion.