View Single Post
  #186  
Old 02-27-2014, 07:43 PM
rwm1273 rwm1273 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Deadmonton
Posts: 6,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ali#1 View Post
I was just pointing out earlier than things like women getting to vote and slaves being freed had much to do with majorities or voting and were usually Implemented by courts and forced through by government. Look at brown v the board of education for example.
Problem is you wanted to say the famous five was about the vote, when it had nothing to do with the vote. You also claimed Canada didn't have slavery, but it did.

Now you want to talk about segregation, an claim it was based upon votes by government and enforced by courts. You seem to be jumping all over the place. If you understood the Brown case, you would understand that it had more to do with the public accepting it then it did with the courts or government forcing it.

If you spoke about later issues such as Wallace's Alabama, or Arkansas, then I would agree that it was the government and courts that forced the issue to end segregation.

It was the NAACP that brought out the Brown case, and they did this in that particular state because they did not expect to have much opposition, and they were pretty much guaranteed to win, which would give them precedence in other jurisdictions where the people was not interested in desegregation.