Thread: Zastava Rifles
View Single Post
  #29  
Old 06-22-2019, 04:58 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270person View Post
Both of these Smith's were just not in favor of short action mag rifles period. Both are decently well known guys and both said the same thing. "Nothing wrong with .300 Win and 270 Win.as they are." "Would never recommend the short mag versions of either." "Not as reliable an action."

Nothing to do with Zastava Dean.
That makes sense, I too am not a fan of the short/fat magnum chamberings. The idea they are desirable because they fit in a short action is lost one me, I can cycle a long action just as fast as a short and the difference in overall length is negligible, not to mention the limitation on seating length for heavier bullets.. No real advantages and lots of draw backs, not the least of which is difficult feeding which is a real problem in a hunting rifle.

Thanks for clarifying.
Reply With Quote