View Single Post
  #142  
Old 11-28-2020, 08:56 AM
pipco pipco is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: edmonton
Posts: 504
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind drift View Post
What part is BS? And by BS, I assume you mean a falsehood? I’m trying to be objective in this, and I question whether anyone, besides the ACA, can determine where their legal risk thresholds are located in this regard. Disagreement with their position by us doesn’t make it a wrong position.
My question would be what are the other reasons ( besides liability) behind this decision?

There are currently many other stocked lakes being aerated with warning signage and fencing.

Same liability issues.

Either I'm completely missing something ( wouldn't be the first time) or else we're not being told other factors involved in the decision.
Reply With Quote