View Single Post
  #16  
Old 03-09-2024, 11:34 AM
litwin litwin is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 59
Default

1-2% total lake mortality! Not per net.

Once again, if people actually watch the video, "angling surveys" are now done using modern technology and tournament style. They are no longer just asking an angler what they catch. But using photo catch release format.

The ignorance is strong with this one as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyTheory View Post
No I totally agree. Even the nuances of how we gill net in the industry (I’m not govnt or involved in any of this) - frequency of checking gill nets (every 2 hours vs every 24 hours) increases survivability. The report used to demonstrate FIN and FSI in the survey shows numbers of 1-2% direct mortality, which are most likely correct. The photos shown at the beginning of the video totally misrepresent what gill netting is.

And , sure, great. Who even wants to dedicate time to a meticulous program? Accuracy matters, and the general public doesn’t even care enough to do a program like this. Totally unrealistic.

2x on ignore.
__________________

Reply With Quote