Thread: Worldviews
View Single Post
  #264  
Old 02-12-2012, 12:58 PM
30Cal's Avatar
30Cal 30Cal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
Evolution versus Creationism.

The debate bible literalists just can't stand, as all the factual, verifiable evidence supports evolution.

But don't take my word for it.

Here is a great article from Nature magazine. They said it much better then I ever could, it is a credible source, and what they discussed is peer reviewed science.

Oh, and they give original references.

Current stuff, not stuff written more then 2000 years ago. They actually know that a bat is a mammal, and not as the bible says (Deuteronomy 14:18), a bird. They also know that a rabbit does not chew it's cud, unlike the bible in the same chapter.

You know, the scientific reality.
avb3

you have chosen a very long debated subject to talk about here. I know you previously seemed to have dismissed Dr. Walt Brown, but I encourage you to be the judge and not another Professor who felt he wasn't given a fair debate with Dr. Walt Brown. Hopefully this will answer some of your many questions.

You be the judge

http://www.creationscience.com/onlin...inningTOC.html
Reply With Quote