Quote:
Originally Posted by Newview01
It's nice to see you never put up a fight, and just do as you are told, whether it is justified or not.
|
I am not a environmental scientist so I have no useful data to combat the decision 1 way or the other. And from the looks of this thread never did many other ATV users.
If the government wanted exactly zero environmental impact then they would close the area to any human presence including grazing leases. But, that is not the case here, they still want humans to be able to enjoy the outdoors. They have determined the area can still be enjoyed without the use of ATV's and by banning them, they are eliminating 1 of the major negative contributing factors to the environment. As I said, I am no scientist, but the logic behind the decision seems fairly simple.