[I’d rather be outdoors]

I’ll just explain my resistance a bit more. Our bio’s have a history of pulling the “easy solution” lever far too often in our province. I’m speaking broadly wether it’s a lake, river, reservoir, or tributary. There’s no time bound or measurable goals to reopening a fishery when they do (this is a big part of the issue I have). This session is just meant to placate the public on a foregone decision already made, don’t fool yourself. Yes, they’re human and they’re also put in a position of authority over public resources so they need to be able to thoroughly explain how deeply they’ve looked into alternative strategies, mitigations, goals, etc. Simply stating that this is the only lever to pull is the definition of disingenuous.

Basically stated, I want to see their detailed (time bound) plan for the “road to recovery” as opposed to a “managing the decline” one constantly proposed.

Wonder if the regs for next year are already printed...