Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284
Nope, this is what it is, since determining any functional level of impairment isn’t currently readable, it’s zero tolerance.
This is the mess that the pending situation has presented to employers. If they can’t say or test for a specific concentration, then it’s simple. Any level is un acceptable. FWIW the BAC for alcohol in my work place is 0.02, that’s like sniffing a cap full of liquor, so it’s pretty much stone cold sober.
When billion dollar equipment and processes, along with human lives potentially being at risk, I’d say a zero tollerence policy is likely the best choice.
|
Nope. This is it what it is now. Not what it will be. Zero tolerance on being impaired in a safety senstitive position is correct.