Quote:
Originally Posted by CNP
Your scenario ^^^^ would not be legal. You're describing a landowner charging access for his land for hunting. The reason CLAS is allowed to operate, in my opinion, is that it is not compensating landowners. A scheme that compensates landowners cannot be allowed under existing law.
|
it's funny you see how this is paid access but your still in denial in what you described in your second post which is text book 100% paid hunting.
You explicitly stated you had no other option to hunt the land owners land then to sign up and pay for access. This was on the land owners recommendation that forced you to pay so you could hunt.
If f&w deem this acceptable then there are so many ways to take the CLAS model and use it for personal gain on your own land.