Quote:
Originally Posted by rem338win
Prove they were ok to drive. That they weren't subtantiatively impaired in some way? We've heard one side of the story, the one you want to believe obviously.
The other side is silent so it makes it difficult to say doesn't it. The system can never be perfect because people are involved. I've watch judges make terrible mistakes too. You put all your faith in them?
So you have two examples out of the thousands and thousands of interactions.
Sounds like we are in pretty good hands really.
|
Childish.... how would I prove that they were ok to drive? Why wouldn't they be? The woman had a blood test done.... 0 alcohol, and dilated pupils don't automatically mean that someone is under the influence of any intoxicating substance. I'm drawing my conclusions from the facts of incidents, not what I "believe".