Quote:
Originally Posted by nof60
There are provisions in the act for them to do this
|
I am of a distinct understanding that that provision is only for their restricted service weapons(pistol, rifle, etc). That provision mostly originates from the fact that LEO's can carry without RPAL or ATT. Personal weapons require both.
I fully appreciate the ambiguous interpretation of the 'elusive' authorized location of discharge; I think it can be agreed upon, however, that if you are allowed to shoot on your own property, it is
your property that you must shoot on. Not a buddy's.
When it is stated that 'people shoot on my land', might that person actually be one of the few with an approved range?