its my opinion lake habitat has as much to do with the success as any regulation....maybe more. I believe all the regs in the world wont make a lake a quality fishery without proper habitat.
I must ask...is this poll or discussion being presented to the people who can make the change. Or is this the incentive to spur people on to contact the government fisheries people?
As ive stated im not against the proposal
1- stock less in the lakes listed as qaulity fisheries already present....use the surplus in other lakes that see high pressure
2- make the tweaks or adjustments to the lakes already listed as quality
But in all fairness i dont believe the proposal should be given any more lakes to be listed as quality until 'success' has been proven in the ones already present. Is that not fair?
|