Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck
That is my point. Your analogy is completely misleading, dramatized, and false. Because you choose to ignore other factors.
In addition to that, you completely ignore the fact that the reality of actual infection rates would put death rates at less than 1%. Possibly significantly so.
Bottom line is, very very few people trust what is being presented or what’s being said. Why? Because we are lied to about this thing every day.
|
The data is not mine.
The data is from the Government websites.
It's clear on infection and mortality rates. That's what I posted.
These are facts.
I know there's math there, and some reading comprehension, but I think I figured it out Chuck.
If you think that data is manipulated, or misleading, I don't know what to tell you. Go tell them they are misleading, manipulating and lying to people. Fill your boots.
I don't have a clue how you come up with "less than 1%" of "actual infection rates" but I'm sure all of us would love to hear it Chuck. Please enlighten us simpletons.
Let me give you hint ..... you want to use "mortality" compared to "total population" for the point you are trying to make I think .....
