Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesB
I will assume you did not read the link. You can't explain what you don't understand, and you just can't bring yourself to learn how a subpoena actually works. Much easier to simply stand around and yell at the sky.
More reading if you are up to learning:
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...of-impeachment |
James,
I read the link.
You don't understand the point and distinction I'm making and, quite honestly, I don't know how else to explain it.
I understand and comprehend the link, and have said myself this is not a legal process, it's a congressional one, but that seems to escape the main point of what I'm saying.
I have a clear understanding of the subpoena process. ( outlined it in a earlier contribution on this thread) - I get it. I even researched it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding it. Trust me, I wouldn't be spinning this any other way.
Obstruction does not have to be legal (or illegal) - that's all - that's it. He is guilty of it. Period. That was my point.
Honestly, who cares ......... I have nothing further to add, say, or try and explain.
Let's move on.