Quote:
Originally Posted by covey ridge
Driving under the influence is a problem that kills. Every time there is fatality or serious injury due to someone being over .08 or showing signs of impairment there is always an outcry that maybe there should be an attempt to get those drunks before they get to that level. There are some that believe that any alcohol is too much to be allowed to drive. I think that the provincial legislation that allows for suspension and seizure of vehicle at .05 is a good compromise between no alcohol allowed and being legally impaired. There is nothing stopping one who has been suspended from getting his own blood level tested.
The argument that some who are at .05 are better drivers than those who do not drink is total BS. No matter how good a driver one is, alcohol does not make one better. I would attribute this argument to those who like to push the limit.
|
For many its the same argument they use to justify speeding.
__________________
Take a kid fishing, kids that fish don't grow up to be A-holes.
|