Quote:
Originally Posted by DiabeticKripple
They fought it in court and won, but now the city is coming at them from what I have gathered.
Edit: it's Parkland County that's coming after them
|
Correct me if I am wrong. The court action that was "won" was a lawsuit launched by a neighbor (DeGeer) claiming damages against the club. That action was "set down" (discontinued).
The Range was "shut down" after it failed on appeal, to obtain a Development Permit. (That had nothing to do with the DeGeer action). The Club appealed to the Provincial court, asking that the County be required to reconsider...but lost that case in court. To re-open, the club would need to resubmit another application for a Development Permit... which, given the history...would have a very limited chance of success.
If a change is made to the land use bylaw, specifically ruling out the establishment of a shooting range as a discretionary use ... then the aforementioned application would have "0 chance for success" as opposed to having "a very limited chance of succcess".
Also, I would assume that if an amendment prohibiting shooting ranges as a discretionary use came into effect, it would not impact on any existing range, but rather, would make it impossible to apply for a new Range within the jurisdiction.