Quote:
Originally Posted by slickwilly
Multiple use is all about balance. Every decision, including making a site a free-for-all restricts somebody. The way I see it, there are many activities that are improved by restricting motorized access, including hunting, for those of us that like to hunt in the backcountry, as well as hiking, fishing, birdwatching, etc, all the activities that are better appreciated in silence.
Alberta has vast areas that are open to quadding, I don't believe that asking for some of the convenient, picturesque, and sensitive sites to be protected is an unfair proposition.
|
And what about the equally vast areas that are not open to quadding, or not accessible to quads but but foot only?
There simply is no reasonable argument for additional OHV bans. More enforcement maybe, but definitely not an outright ban.