View Single Post
  #177  
Old 12-13-2014, 11:34 AM
walking buffalo's Avatar
walking buffalo walking buffalo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigredviking View Post
We do not agree. A simple start, based on a quick look through CWD requirements, there is no requirement for elk head submission and thus no cost. As for the federal component by CF Suffield, this is a training exercise and a quality part of it. This gives them a unique opportunity to work with and manage the "public"; something they would typically not have opportunity for.

As hunters and residents of Alberta, we expect our natural resources to be managed - clearly this will have a cost associated with it. Though I believe you are grossly overestimating the cost of managing the Suffield elk population not to mention the off-set cost an un-managed population would have on the grass/ranching resource in and adjacent to the base.
A very good post that requires one correction.

There is a requirement for these elk heads to be turned in for cwd testing.

The potential for cwd within the herd is a concern effecting both the urgency in obtaining a population reduction and a reason why these animals can Not be relocated.
__________________
Alberta Fish and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Policy -

"to identify very rare, scarce or special forms of fish and wildlife outdoor recreation opportunities and to ensure that access to these opportunities continues to be available to all Albertans."
Reply With Quote