View Single Post
  #107  
Old 12-05-2014, 06:43 AM
MountainTi's Avatar
MountainTi MountainTi is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 7,312
Default

A full curl regulation is the least desirable of all options, for many obvious reasons. For zones that do need a change, there are many more preferable ideas that will help, but of course in SRD's mind would be harder to implement than just a blanket "full curl" rule

-habitat improvement is pretty obvious, need prescribed burns in a pretty big way.
-predator control. Cougar harvest needs to be increased in the west country. Trouble with the CMA borders is they use the FTR as the boundry. How many cats are actually being hunted in sheep country. Don't even have to bring up how many sheep are being killed by cats. Wolves will be taking their fair share also off of the lower wintering ranges also.
-decrease outfitter tags in some of these zones. 420 is one of the zones where there is a known problem with sheep numbers, why is there 8 nonresident tags there?
-substinence hunting......need I say more? Yeah I do actually. Sheep need to be put on a "no go" list. Male or female, doesn't matter. A change would not only decrease the amount of trophy sheep being harvested during times of year when they are most vulnerable, it would also increase their available range/habitat once again. Limestone mountain is a perfect example of that.
__________________
Two reasons you may think CO2 is a pollutant
1.You weren't paying attention in grade 5
2. You're stupid
Reply With Quote