No, I'm not necessarily in line with it. I'm just not of the philosophy that it's automatically going to be bad or cost billions in the long term.
Yes, the long gun registry costs a crapload, but it would have cost a lot less and worked out better if it weren't implemented by a Liberal government that was up to its a55 in crazy nepotism and feelings of entitlement. I don't think it's inherently unfair or stupid. It just needs to be knocked apart and re-built. Because the post above is totally correct: the registry, as it stands to-day, isn't stopping crimes.
What I'd like to see is a breakdown of how this ammo thing is going to happen. I think that maybe they don't quite know yet, and *that* aspect is maybe a little scary.
|