View Single Post
  #30  
Old 10-05-2013, 11:51 PM
MK2750's Avatar
MK2750 MK2750 is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sylvan Lake
Posts: 3,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemonz View Post
Actually it's the .280 is derived from the 30-06. .270 is the 30-03.

And I guess that's another one to consider - lol.

Lemonz
From The American Rifleman
July 1, 1925 “A New Winchester Bolt Action Rifle” by E.A. Price “ The new .270 WCF cartridge designed especially for this rifle is a praiseworthy achievement of our New Haven friends. It is simply the .30 Springfield shell necked down to .270 caliber, the shell being very slightly lengthened in the process.”

Your source, Wiki I assume, also claims the 280 was made off of the 30-03 case. They would be wrong again IMO but arguments go on both ways. It too is longer than the parent case leading to the confusion.

To the OP, the 270 is a specialized deer rifle IMO and it would fit right in with what you have. It will do most anything the bigger 7 will do to a deer without the recoil. It will work for Elk and Moose but you already have the 300 for that job and the 270 shines with lighter bullets.

I would go with the 280 offered in left hand myself and sell the 7mm. mag.

Last edited by MK2750; 10-05-2013 at 11:59 PM.
Reply With Quote