View Single Post
  #446  
Old 07-02-2012, 09:46 AM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trouty View Post
There is no true way to get the real numbers correct. There will have to be some reliance on honesty yes. But it is far better than what is being done today. Yes no motive to fudge previously, but a far smaller sampling.
So I still have to wonder what is better; a smaller honest sample or a larger dishonest sample. Unfortunately, in some WMUs we are talking such small numbers that one or two people could keep a general season open or put it on draw by not being honest. While there has been some indication that ESRD indicated they were not confident in the numbers at a southern meeting, other ESRD staff seem perfectly confident in the numbers. It is a strange situation.
Reply With Quote