Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter
Or better yet, they could sell their land to developers so it could be subdivided and then it would be lost forever to wildlife and hunters. Personally, I don't mind them getting a few tax concessions to indulge their lifestyle.
|
This comment bothers me. I have heard this comment time and again. If we do not do something developers are going to come in and subdivide or develop the land. I could possibly see this in 300 but not in 108. I know of at least one attempt to subdivide and sell lots in 300 that failed miserably. Great view of the mountains, close to Waterton, subdivided, everything you could dream of. Not 1 lot sold. What developer is interested in land in 108? If they are Why? Not much call for a subdivision on the ridge as far as I can tell.
Wow that was interesting. Type my response come back and all these posts are gone. OH well still stand by my above statement.
Bubba