Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It does not bother some and it bothers others to the point that they give up hunting . However that is their decision and their decision only . I know several decorated snipers that quit hunting animals after their first tour. I also know several who hunt as hard or harder after their retirement . As far as ethics go, before a person starts tossing stones at glass houses in the name of righteous ethics they should take a good look inside themselves , no one is perfect . Cat |
Quote:
|
Shooting past 500 does take skill. Me personally have never shot past 600 most likely never will. sheep are about the only animal I’d ever have to shoot that far and always seem to get into them under 200
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
I just am not sure why he is so upset and swearing at me.
|
Quote:
|
What wrong with shooting long range?
Why not? The only reason why I have bought better gear, reload my own ammo, spend lots of time at the range, etc. Is specifically so that I can shoot further with confidence First shot hits out to 900 yards with a hunting rifle is pretty good Sure there’s the chance that the animal can move No different that shooting at a animal with a bow, that can jump the string I think it’s far more ethical to have some one like chuck shooting long range, Than a guy who cant hit the broadside of a barn shooting at a moose at 150 yards away |
Quote:
Quote:
For my style of hunting I'd prefer to be better at offhand shooting than long distance shooting. Not saying that you can't be perfect at both. |
You can shoot targets all you want hit or miss it wont be wounded.
Shooting at game is far different than any target period. Variables in the field can and do end up with wounded and lost animals,especially at extreme range. Far too many long range braggers out there for me. A good ethical hunter worth their salt should practice fieldcraft which includes stalking closer. The hunter that sees game at 800 yards away then blazes away is far less skilled than the one who sneaks in to under 300 yards, and takes the ethical shot. |
Quote:
|
Nice shooting Chuck.
And 400ish ain’t that miraculous on game, subject to the big if. But you also knew very well the tone and direction this thread was going to take, didn’t you Chuck? Admit it, it’s ok, you’re not necessarily wrong bringing this up, but let’s face it, I’d sooner try to scrub the balls on a bobcat in a phone both, before I tried bringing up about taking longish pokes at game. Every time this subject comes up a great big donniebrooke ensues. So unless you’re on some sort of crusade or have some perverse need to be recognized, what’s the point? Some do, some can’t, some might, some won’t. But beating ones head against a brick wall only feels good when you stop. |
Actually, save for one guy, it’s been quite civil. I’m not sure why differences of opinion scare so many.
|
Quote:
|
I am not a fan of long range hunting, but I also won't project my choices upon others.
I do know that if filling my freezer depended on an 800 yard shot, Chuck is likely the guy I would want behind the trigger. BTW, I have never met Chuck, never spoken with him beyond the odd pm, and would not hire him as a Santa in the mall, cuz he bloody well refuses to smile, and he'd scare the kids. However, unlike many keyboard warriors who are taking potshots at him, he is in the field sending lead downrange, from hunting positions, more than anyone I know of. |
Quote:
Timing is every think . Hoping he does not move in 1/3 of a second and wind does not blow harder and you have a good rest . |
Lots of guys shoot better and more than me. But it is a hoot. Shoot with me and you will see me smile. And I’m never jealous of someone’s success at the range. It’s always fun.
I am not advocating long range hunting. My three hunting rifles all wear fixed power Leupolds. Two fixed 6’s and one old M8 4X. But, I do advocate someone’s ability to make that decision on their own. There are very capable shots out there. |
My thoughts.
Sitting or laying prone and shooting at a steel target that doesn't move isn't really the same as being in the field and shooting at a target that might move any second, and how you sit, lay, rest rifle is many times different then in the controlled setting of target shooting. Don't get me wrong target shooting helps, but field conditions are just that feild conditions. Hands are cold, your excited, no real time to quess wind, that one thorn in the field is some how right under you and poking you as you take the shot. So skill, luck, fluke, bit of all of that I think if going way out there on a shot. Personally I keep my shots under 200 most time 50 yrds. Have dropped o e deer at just under 600 yrds and I'd say I got really lucky and still took me 2 shots last one at about 100 yards, won't ever personally do it again, was much younger and had more confidence then brains, I could easily snuck up on him, but I had something to prove I quess. Now I like talking about how I snuck up to 20 yrds of that deer instead of I dropped him at 400 yrds. Just my thoughts. |
Odd
My post double posted odd.. Edited everything out please delete this
|
The only problem I have with long range hunting is a very tiny percentage of the people who try it do not understand the practice and knowledge that goes into being successful. Way too many watch a TV program where they dump a bull elk at 1100 yards and then they head into Cabelas to buy a "long range' rifle and head into the bush to give it a go... then of course you have the people that are jealous of the guys that shoot thousands of rounds a year to become proficient at it.:)
|
For me 600y is possible then you add wind gusts and forget it.
400y max on deer for me. |
Quote:
I think its more the scorpion optics, range, dial and shoot commercials If you google gunwerks, you realize everything they use is big bucks Do a search for that scorpion junk and voila. Why do I need to spend all that money on the gunwerks gear. Ryan kohler says this scope works great Gunwerks and extreme outer limits advertise their shooting schools as much as the rifles. Everyone Ive talked to that has gone, says they wish they would have done it when they were younger |
After reading this thread I’ve got just two things to say. First is, I’d like an eatmore right about now, secondly, long range success is like attaining anything. If you don’t practice and happen to make a 700+yd shot on an animal, I’d say it’s got a lot to do with luck. If you have the right equipment and have taken the time to learn how to use it, then less of the factor in your success is fluke imo. I have a rifle that I feel comfortable shooting out to 500yds with, but it’s not equipped with a scope that has turrets. Another rifle I have has turrets and a proven load, a lot of fun to shoot long range with. I’ve shot it at long range enough times to know that when the wind is blowing I’m not shooting at any animals, 3/5 shots in the kill zone is not good enough average for me. Other people are probably able to do better than me, I’ll leave those shots to them.
Too many people like to judge another’s abilities based on their own. I know Chuck started this thread expecting the backlash, I do the same thing myself some days. All the practice and equipment in the world won’t do you any good if buck fever kicks in and you start shaking like a leaf though :sHa_shakeshout: |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.