Gerald Stanley's charges for improperly storing guns slated for Sask. court today
The North Battleford courtroom is slated to hear charges that Stanley, 56, improperly stored seven guns on his Biggar, Sask.-area property where Boushie, 22, was fatally shot in August 2016.
Although the people in the car weren't charged for having a loaded rifle and no PAL. Interesting to see how this plays out http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskat...sask-1.4581330 |
Do FN need a PAL? Legit question
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Prime example of how new gun laws won’t fix or stop crime!! Typical!!
|
For the 2nd time, all charges against the 4 in the car were dropped in favor of testimony given. Ok maybe the 900th time it has been discussed here.
It has been said many times on many forums if it had not been for the inconsistencies in testimony given by the 4 in the car Stanley may well be in prison right now. Deliberate play by a sympathetic Crown? Lesser of 5 evils? |
Quote:
Whether or not they were charged, my point is that prohibiting them from possessing firearms, did not prevent them from possessing firearms. As well, they were drunk, and the firearm was loaded in a motor vehicle. So it doesn't matter what firearms laws are passed, as long as these people are not in prison, they will find access to firearms, and they will commit crimes while possessing the firearms. |
Interesting point is he was not charged for improper storage of the Restricted handgun as it was "considered to be in his possesion". He was charged for not properly storring dangerous 22's, shotguns probably used to shoot coyotes on the farm.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Stanley, 56, improperly stored seven guns on his Biggar, Sask.-area property where Boushie, 22, was fatally shot in August 2016. Although the people in the car weren't charged for having a loaded rifle and no PAL. I think the Crown possibly feels they have to convict Stanley with something so the protesting crowd can put a win in 'their column' and settle down. |
He will get them all back if he promises to not do it again. Maybe a fine.
|
What a mess.
These degenerates show up on his land to terrorize his family and now his once peaceful life is now a mess of legal battles. See what a life of minding your own business can get you, all it takes is having some douchebags target you as their next victim. Sad. |
Just because they are fn doesnt make them non canadian and all canadians with firearms require a pal
|
I haven't been following the "case" but would assume it wouldn't make sense to charge the dead chap if it was his .22. They must have pulled prints, but I suppose that really doesn't prove much.
I guess if there is a lesson here, it is that once a charge is laid ... expect everything to be looked at. |
Quote:
|
From CBC (http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskat...ewan-1.4581330)
The seven guns alleged to be stored improperly by Stanley, as listed in the court file, are: A J Stevens Arms Company 520 rifle. A .22-calibre semi-automatic rifle. A .22-calibre bolt-action rifle. A Winchester 1200 shotgun. A Lakefield Mark 2 .22-calibre rifle. A Winchester 1894 rifle. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
.0005% or less? |
Prosecution asked for more time. Set over to April 19.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Gonna guess they've been " improperly stored " for decades with no problem. Crock of **** imo. Give him the citizen of the Year award and call it a day.
They tried the same thing with my dad and his home invasion. He told the cops that that'll be the last time he'd call them. The cops attitudes changed after that. |
Quote:
Maybe Mr. Stanley can just show the judge his white privilege card :angry3: |
Quote:
Grizz |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.