Quote:
|
Quote:
There’s a few pros that keep judging but most of it isn’t even relevant to the discussion. Their own issues really. Comparing a 6.5 cm to. 300 win mag is like attacking someone’s religion. Like the 300 wm is legend...May as well be the JC of cartridges. So I expect this...however...not afraid to put the actual data on paper despite the known barrage of attack. There is not a single thing wrong with the viewpoint presented. To think there’s a big difference between increasing the diameter of a needle by a few percent as compared to the something the size of the quilt you’re pushing it through is hard to explain due to the previous institutions. Not trying to dethrone anything here, just educate what seems so obvious to those trusting the numbers that actually gave some of these things the reputations they have. We just weren’t sure exactly what numbers did what they did. We know more now. I just presented a different way to see that. 1/4” needle or 1/3” needle to a 10 square foot quilt is really that big a deal eh? The quilt can tell? No...that needle with same velocity and sd is going the same distance. |
At least have the respect to get a name right on here...are you in grade 7? We must be beyond this no?
|
Quote:
I really hope he is a 13 year old kid and his parents are out for the evening. |
Quote:
Use bullets,not needles or friends, or things you heard. |
S.D. is everything!
1 Attachment(s)
Now I get it. :fighting0007:
|
http://www.fredbear-online.com/POD/Momentum.pdf
Suggest you read ALL of this first if you plan on responding |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyhow, just curious if you caught that one. |
Quote:
Xbolt7mm |
Quote:
|
Quote:
PS I helped you make a more correct statement at the end. It works in a simplified world now at least! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
At how many yards does each round drop below 2000 foot pounds of energy?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I will contribute. I have shot the 260 Rem (not the CM) long enough to see the benefits of it, I have also had my fair share of flings with various magnums to also realize there benefits as well. I’m not a long range hunter so all this really means nothing to me, the difference of any of these rounds to 300 yards isn’t much. I’m old and not much of a magnum guy anymore. I also think the relation between SD & penetration means absolutely nothing with today’s bullets. Sometimes, most of you are saying the same thing but in different themes, and argue about it. Makes me laugh. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Does it really matter what the headstamp is?
Shouldn’t the main focus be to consistently hit the vitals? If you can’t hit the vitals you probably shouldn’t be using a magnum |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Persevere ......... good.
Perseverate ........ bad. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There was a few who didn’t think a Creedmoor was a suitable deer cartridge let alone a moose cartridge. I was present for 3 moose kills this fall and 2 deer and one elk. Rifles used (in order) were a 300wsm (moose running at approximately 150yds on first shot hit in the liver, made it about 80yds before stopping, a follow up shot in the lungs dropped it, then a third shot was taken from point blank to dispatch animal. Second one was a moose in the hump at approximately 200yds with a 300 win mag, it dropped on the spot but required a finishing shot from point blank. Next was a moose in the hump at 393yds with a 260rem, dropped in its tracks and also required a follow up shot from point blank range. Then onto deer season, sons buck shot in the neck from about 160yds with a 270 win, buck down right in its tracks, required a follow up shot from point blank to dispatch. Next was an elk, shot in the hind quarter at a ranged 427yds with a 300 win mag, second shot was through the front shoulders dropping the elk, a third shot was taken from point blank to dispatch animal. Last one I was present for was a deer, not ranged but estimated at around 300 yards, 280ai first shot was in the boiler room, deer stopped but did not fall over, second shot again in the boiler room, deer still did not tip over, third shot in the antler because shooter thought shots were hitting low, deer was quartering away so antler was in line with vitals, deer decided to lay down, no further shots were required. Moral of the story, most of the people I know shoot 300 magnums, but they don’t kill any faster than a 260, 270, or a 280 on moose, deer or elk at ranges of 0-500yds. My son has a late season draw for elk so I will update the story in January when my son kills his elk, see how it matches up with the elk kill I was present for. 2 moose and one deer I watched drop in their tracks this fall, only one was hit by a magnum and as luck would have it, all 3 required a follow up shot from point blank. The only animal out of the six which did not require a follow up shot from point blank was shot by a 280. I’m not gonna say the 280 is the best big game cartridge in the world but..... :) |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.