Listened to 630ched for an hour this morning. They are railing against Danielle Smith. Their making it seem like parents aren't happy about the parental rights changes.

They had on the head of the teachers association, some Trans people and the hosts have constantly talked about how bad the parental rights are.

Their views are clear. Of course it all centers on kids will kill themselves due to the changes.

Let your mlas know your happy with the changes.

Better late than never, and she wasn’t particularly happy to have to do it (due to her “relative”) - but for the first time Dani actually DID something conservative.

Hope the guys behind the scenes holding the cattle prod remember the setting. Might see some things actually change in our province.

She's a slippery slope trying to do anything "conservative" in this country. The minority is very vocal and the media.....we all know which way they lean. That doesn't help. Being a conservative in politics is a tough road nowadays.
We need a start over

LOL. A lot of inner turmoil in the left leaning populace nowadays.

A big problem I see is the definition of a "conservative" has changed so dramatically in the last few years Danielle is now considered right wing extremist by lefties who actually believe they are right. I read it every day..

Makes one wonder why they want access to our kids so badly... :thinking-006:

One of the best things I have read all morning. :D

Exactly!

Listening to QR 770 this Am. Hilarious, Rob the fill in host is doing his best to paint Daniel as the bad guy. He has all sorts of "experts" out of joint on this, Ottawa is sending a "guy" lol. But caller after caller voice their support for our premier. lol

Good for her. That’s a step in the right direction. We have to be strong on parental rights.
I think most if not all of us did something as a teenager that we regret. Some of the decisions we made in our teens we wouldn’t make today. I know most of my friends have a tattoo they got early in life and they now regret it. At least a tattoo can be covered with a new one or removed.

This..

I am starting to wonder if all this trans stuff is a distraction. Who in their right mind wants to remove a parent from a child’s life! Take a step back and think about it! Not sure why this group of people want access to kids. That’s concerning to say the least. With all the real issues going on in this country many are focused on this crap.

Oh, no doubt! Among many other things.

The activists will be very disappointed when they realize that they are no longer needed.

Get with the Pronouns Bud!

That's Zer, Zim and ... Zit???

Just trying to help.

But yes common sense is something that has to be brought back into the conversation.

Children are just that, Children.

We treat them differently because they are learning their place in the world, focusing their personal values, and trying out their decisions that in later years they laugh at as misguided and rebellious. Children should be forgiven for their decisions in their youth.

But Gender Re assignment cannot be reversed or erased.

Once they are an adult, Society presumes personal responsibility, and that is the point. At that point they are free to choose.

Drewski

Thinking about this kind of thing resulted in a shift in my opinions on residential schools - I have developed much more empathy for the First Nations families that were torn apart and taken from their culture and beliefs..

I've listened to 3 different radio hosts today and all 3 are speaking against Danielle Smith and not letting anyone with differing opinions speak very much.

The left hates children and families, particularly families. They cannot control the narrative at home. I hope Daniel brings in money following the student, give parents a choice as to whether or not they want kids indoctrinated. Interesting that all this flared up after they allow the gay clubs and their recruiting into the schools.

Float the line or go home without a pay check? Or maybe they are that flakey they actually believe it?

A minor needs parental permission to even get a tattoo… You would hope that removing genitalia and/or injecting hormones to suppress nature would be treated at the very least as serious as getting a tattoo underage.

I was wondering if it's what the station is demanding. With that said the one host specifically said he hated it all. And that's his position as he's got lgbtqyfvaodh family. He was a bit more up front.

Still nauseating to listen to....

I see my resident Liberal loser Randy Boisilgbtqdoo is encouraging people to protest outside the Legislature this Saturday. Might have to go show my support....for the UCP.

What I find funny is Stacy brotzls hubby,Thomas Lukaszuks stance on all of this.Being the ceo for Halal Financial corp. sharia law compliant home financing.Might be bad for business.

Typical leftist thinking. Their opinion is the only one that matters.

Yeah I've got kids. What I wouldn't want is to have them marginalized or discriminated against because of something as trivial as gender and sexuality.

DS's ban on gender reassignment surgery is a joke. First off, I'm not sure any gender reassignment has been done with minors here in the province. Though I'm sure she put that point in for the good ol' Christian Conservatives.

Let me give you an example of something that might happen here:
- Young women (minors) have had breast reductions because the boys tease them in school. That's ok?
- A young woman who wants a breast reduction for any other reason that doesn't align with someone else's values is a no? Just because DS said so?

That's laughable. And it's no one else's business. Furthermore, there is nothing DS and her government could do about it anyhow.

What's next? Abortions?

^This.

I am not religious, but I am against allowing minors to mutilate themselves without their parents knowledge/permission. There is already too much social engineering, going on in our schools, without this.

How can somebody feel a fad movement and a teachers union is more vested to ensure my child thrives more than my wife or I would?

Just stunning!!!

Furthermore, why is it healthy to coach kids into ill-informed decisions to join the sect of humanity with the highest suicide rates of any? How is that healthy to vastly multiply their chances of suicide. Children have no business trying to make such decisions. Let children be children.

Honestly, I think a lot of the people who chime into these things hitting every buzzword they can are plants attempting to get people riled up and speaking out of anger hoping they can be made out like nutbars. Giving into them and letting them push buttons is the worst things one can do. Calming disagreeing and countering their obvious attempts at sewing derision is how we can get more respect among the masses.

Well said.

The way I heard it was, you're not allowed to pick your bed time, but you can irretrievably determine your gender ? :confused:

No kidding, just another socialist that thinks he knows better than parents. Everything Daniel said is just plain common sense. I guess it's not that common anymore. Especially amongst the educated that somehow see themselves as better than the foolish masses. Pittman is definitely a government shill, he was put here during covid and seems to like being here. Too bad the only time he comments is when it is to tell us how stupid the unwashed masses are. How people that have no love for a child can somehow think that he should be able to tell the child's parents what's what's is mind boggling. But it is the lefts way, government and their reps know best. I saw an interesting meme, it was a photo of a bunch of native kids in front of a school taken many years ago. The punch line was " the last time governments thought they knew what was better for their kids than the parents did". Something to think about pittman.

I absolutely hope that Danny follows through and has education money follow kids. A mass migration to other learning centers, won't take long for public education figures out they overstepped its bounds.

So can you explain to me exactly which part of 'Religion' you feel all parental rights falls under?
I'm having a real problem following a set path with these giant leaps you guys keep making.

I thought 'Parental Rights' kind of implied all parents, not just ones of a certain faith.